The Triumph of Life: An Assault Upon the Values of the Current Society 10 страница

It is amazing that these matters are so seldom thought about but that is what happens when men contrive an artificial world within their own heads and proceed to put that artificial world into practice. Instead of looking at his newborn son with thoughts of what sort of father he will make one day, our fathers are thinking about what sort of college he will get into and the same goes of course for our mothers and their daughters. Such concerns, however, are merely the product of the propaganda that has been meted out to us, propaganda that would like us to believe that a college education (somehow) means everything. Thus we have a race which is more ignorant about the natural and hence correct usages of its bodies than a hippopotamus is in an African stream. We have women who are afraid of being pregnant, for example, as if being pregnant were some kind of bizarre state of affairs instead of the very reason for their being. We have men who would rather gratify themselves with pornography than create life with a good wife, men who deem the artificial feeling conjured up by a mere picture to be as worthwhile as the creation of sons and daughters. We have women who think they must do what men do—i. e. have “careers”—in order to obtain fulfillment in life when it is their wombs rather which provide the basis for that fulfillment intrinsically. We have women who treat the family dog as their “child” instead of wanting to have a child of their own. We have men who would rather fornicate with a whore than respect the value of their own seed. In sum, sex has become utterly detached from the purpose for which it exists and we have a constantly degenerating and dwindling race on our hands as a result. Our people do not appreciate the greatness of their own stock and are willing to see it disgraced, befouled, and terminated from the face of the earth. They squander their own sexual energy and divert it from the purpose for which it exists: the furtherance of their race. The ability of human beings to engage in abstract thought enables them to suppress, override, and thwart their own natural instincts, instincts which would otherwise further the race were they allowed to rule the day. Only Nature, however, and observance of and obedience to her values can build a better race and only a better race can build a better tomorrow. The artificial values of men, no matter how strongly they are propagandized and instilled within us, can never do so.

In the natural world of course, there is no such thing as putting off copulation (and procreation) with the opposite sex for years once puberty has been reached; the fact that our youth are deemed too immature mentally for that today is an indictment actually of our entire society since that society has caused such a mismatch between the yearnings of the body and the facility of the mind. In other words, were this society healthy, no such mismatch would exist. To be sure, puberty takes place considerably earlier in our race today than it biologically should on account of the poor diets we consume—something that will be discussed in the pages that follow in due course—but the fact remains that the body is not lying somehow when it tells our teenagers to breed: now. The body thus is the best educator here, not those who would instead counsel it to deny itself for years and even decades or, worse still, counsel it to waste what sexual energy it has on dead-end sexual relations that don’t produce anything. The artificial “morality” of today’s world is no match for that natural morality which is intrinsic to every living creature. It is the judgment of that morality to which I myself submit. One leads to a healthy, vigorous, expanding race; the other leads to a sickly, debilitated, and retreating one. The choice is therefore clear. The body should not be denied when it speaks so plainly; the maturity of the body takes precedence over the maturity of the mind, especially considering the fact that instinct is, and always has been, more important than thought in the first place.

In point of fact, it is routine menstruation which is the unnatural activity here, not pregnancy and nursing which is the natural state of affairs for all post-pubescent and pre-menopausal females of our race. In other words, menstruation does not occur much in a natural state of affairs: our women rather are pregnant, nursing their children—thus not capable of getting pregnant while that is taking place—or no longer capable of getting pregnant or of nursing children at all. Thus all of the inconvenience which menstruation entails over the life span of our women today is actually a self-inflicted phenomenon; since sexual desire is intrinsic to pre-menopausal, post-pubescent females and since it is equally intrinsic for the males of our race to meet that desire, there really shouldn’t be much “idle time”: menstruating for lack of a check on that situation. Rather, pregnancy and nursing is the natural state of affairs until those functions have been (permanently) concluded. Menstruation, after all, is simply the discarding of reproductive material which the organism had failed to utilize the previous month; it stands to reason then that using that material is the natural state of affairs for otherwise there would be no material to discard. It is not some sort of coincidence that birth control pills have harmful side effects; after all, the purpose of the female body is being defied by the usage of those pills and the body reacts to that defiance accordingly. It is the purpose of the female body to conceive and that is so regardless of whether a (misnamed) “feminist” someplace would prefer that women be like men instead; if that purpose be subverted, of course there are going to be side effects. In any case, the question is why the women of our race would want to subvert the natural purpose of their bodies in the first place. The answer, of course, is purely societal influence and indoctrination, not the instinct which cries out to them from their own flesh. No matter how a society is presently structured, there is still the ability to follow instincts which are the product of thousands, nay millions, of years of evolutionary processes. It is the society which is the artificial entity here, not those instincts which demonstrate loud and clear the purpose for which we exist: the furtherance of our kind. Women are meant to have babies, quite simply. The individual, not being able to live forever herself, continues a chain of beings which does live forever provided that each link of it heeds the same instinctive call in turn as she did, the call to replicate her own kind. The individual dies but the race lives. It is physiologically impossible for any individual creature to live forever; therefore the individual creature compensates by breeding beings which can in a collective sense, generation by generation. Those beings which created us—our parents—implant within us the urge to create more beings ourselves. Thus the chain of life goes on and on, long after we ourselves have personally met our doom. Our descendants are the only eternal life we will ever know; the purpose of sex is to make that eternal life possible: for our race.

The proper course of society then is not to disdain, defy, or suppress that which we as natural beings are meant to do like every other organism upon the face of the earth but rather to support it and facilitate it and enhance it to an ever greater level. Society must be made to conform to the values of the natural world, not the other way around, for it is those values, and only those values, which are conducive to healthy life. Our society must return to those values, just as the society of every other race of creature upon the earth already adheres to those values as a matter of course. Nature does not care one whit about whether the reproduction of the race is “convenient, ” bad for one’s “career, ” or economically challenging; rather, the drive is there to further the race irrespective of such things, things which could only be of concern to a race which has wrongly divorced itself from the natural world and her values in the first place. Whatever we stuff into people’s heads—whether it be artificial ideals, facts, figures, or whatever—matters a whole lot less than the fulfillment of the very purpose for why we exist. That purpose is the furtherance of the race, both within the circumstances of its current life as well as in the sense that the race is furthered into the future when we and our descendants reproduce ourselves, generation by generation.

It follows then that the production of mongrel beings—the breeding of beings from two disparate racial stocks instead of one homogeneous stock—is a perversion of the entire basis for sexual relations which is, as we have seen, racial furtherance. Since creatures copulate in order for their race to continue on after they themselves have met their doom, it follows that interracial marriage is not only a frustration of that purpose but a mutilation of it. Creatures copulate in order to preserve their race, not to destroy it, and thus interracial breeding not only defeats the purpose for which sex exists at all—the furtherance of the race into the future—but destroys the race altogether through the production of beings who are not of the same kind as those who are lost. In a normal scheme of things, the individual must die but he lives on in a racial sense through the creation of descendants who are of the same stock as he was. By means of analogy, the leaves of a tree die, indeed every season, and yet the tree itself lives on, replacing the leaves it has lost with new ones which are, in essence, the same as those leaves. Indeed, if one were to look at a race objectively and from afar, it would seem as though none of its members die at all for it is constantly replenishing itself; it is like a field of grass in which the “grass” as a whole is always alive and intact regardless of whatever occurs with its individual blades. The collective “grass” never dies even if its individual blades do; when we look at the field, it is that whole with which we are concerned, not the individual blades which compose it. The same would be true of the races of men were they to be objectively observed by the other races of life upon this planet: the race itself would be deemed the only objective reality by those observers in light of the transitory nature of those individual creatures which compose it. The vast majority of men throughout history have left nothing behind when they died as far as their non-flesh accomplishments are concerned; they come and go but only their descendants remain. They then are only the link in the chain of racial being which makes those descendants possible, the race itself being the only entity which is always alive. Again, the individual cannot keep living; therefore he enables his race to keep living in his stead by breeding with another member of his kind. On the other hand, when an individual mongrelizes his blood with that of another race, he destroys the eternity of that kind. He thwarts his own purpose for existing upon this earth in the first place. His existence is worse than worthless; it is positively harmful and destructive. On the other hand, by staying true to your race and breeding your own kind, you will not live a thousand years from now but the race will which you have continued. You died but it lives. That, in sum, is the entire basis for the existence of sexual relations.

That basis is foiled with racial mongrelization: the race was not continued but rather destroyed. The race is not replenished; the individual, having amalgamated his or her genes with another racial being, is rather its dead end. The race did not live on after the individual’s demise as is supposed to occur. The individual’s reproductive capability was used to destroy the race instead of being used to preserve it. Thus the entire purpose of sex is thwarted; indeed, sex becomes an enemy instead of a friend. It is thus the case that race mongrelizers—those who produce mongrel offspring—are the worst people that there are, for they literally kill off our racial existence with their deeds and replace our White Race upon this earth with non-white beings, thus defying the very purpose for which all of us exist at all. Instead of replacing “A” with “A” as Nature intended, “A” is replaced with “AB” which is not, and never can be, the same as “A. ” The race was not furthered; rather, a mongrel being was furthered. The race did not replace itself; rather it killed itself. Instead of continuing, the racial line comes to an end. You die and it dies.

This is why, when our natural instincts have not been successfully suppressed by unnatural belief systems and otherwise, racial mongrelization has always evoked such a visceral reaction in people even if they lacked the verbal sophistication to explain it; we instinctively look at racial mongrelization as the worst form of murder that it is and are revolted by it accordingly. Our instincts cry out against the combination of beings who simply do not belong together, as well as the very product of that fusion: the racial mongrel. Furthermore, the greater the difference in the DNA of the particular races involved, the greater is our revulsion. That is easy to understand enough, as the racial alien in that case happens to be even more alien to us genetically than could otherwise be the case and the result is an even more thorough destruction of our racial existence accordingly. In other words, the reason why the mixing of the different races of men is increasingly distasteful to us the greater the genetic difference between those races is that our racial death is accomplished the more decisively the greater that genetic difference. We instinctively realize that such mongrelization destroys our kind more thoroughly than that of other scenarios and hate it more accordingly. Hence why there is no racial mixing upon this earth more repulsive to our instincts than that of the pure member of our White Race with that of the pure member of the black, for the fact of the matter is that there are no two races of men more disparate genetically than these two races. If one were to place the blondest Nordic woman side by side with the blackest Negro man, there can be no denying the fact that these individuals are not only different races within the common usage of the term but different species and perhaps even different genera for that matter. Hence we realize, instinctively, that the mongrelization of the two destroys our White Race in a way that cannot be redeemed. The race is dead and that is that.

Notably, the fact that the different races of men can learn to speak the same languages means nothing; that is merely a function of brain power, not connotation of racial similitude. In other words, separate species of creatures can certainly learn to communicate with one another if their respective intellectual evolution has progressed far enough; that does not mean, however, that they are part of the same race, the same species, and so forth. It only means that they have the mental ability to mimic one another’s form of communication, while retaining the intrinsic and disparate natures which all creatures respectively possess. A Bantu Negro is still a Bantu Negro whether he speaks Bantu, Swahili, Dutch, or Chinese. A Swede is still a Swede likewise. In any case, the genetic gulf between the White and Black races of men is so massive that their merger represents to us quite literally, on an instinctive level, the most abominable act of which human life is capable and that is why the mere sight of a black man hand-in-hand with a White woman is so disturbing to all those whose instincts have remained intact and their honesty likewise: we behold not only the perversion of our genetic being in progress but its absolute annihilation. We behold a kind of death before us in living form; indeed, it is worse than death since it is the perversion, the mutilation, of our racial being. We instinctively understand that here before us our race is not being furthered but destroyed instead. Sex, as well as the sexes themselves, are not only failing to fulfill the purpose for which they exist—they furtherance of the race—but are being used to annihilate that race from the face of the earth.

Of course very little of this sentiment takes place on a conscious level with most people. That is because they have been indoctrinated with unnatural values, values which tell them that there is no difference between the races aside from the color of their skin, that it is the moral duty of White people to integrate fully with the non-white races and “root out” all racist sentiments and practices, and so forth. Our instincts remain, however, instincts whose evolution long precedes the indoctrination of the past several decades and whose expression cannot always be suppressed. We instinctively know that race mixing is wrong because it quite literally kills off our genetic existence, the racial existence which should by all rights continue long after we ourselves as individuals will have met our demise. We instinctively know that racial mongrelization must be opposed and stopped because it kills the only “eternal life” there is or will ever be: the life of a race, a race which goes on interminably by virtue of the reproduction of its members. It is possible in fact that the very word “race” derives from this understanding: that life indeed is like a (relay) race: not being able to endure the whole gamut of time, the individual hands off his baton of life to another—by virtue of his reproduction—who does the same in turn and the process repeats itself ad infinitum. However, as implied, this is a kind of “race” which never ends and never should end, for here it is life itself that we are dealing with and not a mere sporting event. Thus in the natural course of things the individual dies but the race lives. Thus of course racial mongrelization evokes our fanatical hatred as it means the end of the only real “eternal life” of which men are capable; it is the bandying about of a mutilated death in living form, the very image of our own racial annihilation. It is the equivalent of a corpse walking about, only worse, for while a corpse represents the death of merely one individual, as an individual, the racial mongrel represents the death of the race itself, the walking embodiment of racial destruction. No one can rightly complain then about the visceral hatred which our White people have had at all times for the mixing of their race with that of its polar opposite the black, for that hatred is in its essence merely the rightful protest of our genes at the prospect of their own demise. We hate as a means of preserving ourselves, the life that is within us, the life that is meant to succeed us, forever.

Every living thing is the product of those genes which compose it. Those genes want to live as much as the organism itself does. It is thus a mistake to look upon a creature as a monolithic entity solely subject to its own conscious will. Rather, all of us are the product of the countless living cells that compose us, and so no matter the indoctrination which may be meted out to our respective psyches by the society in which we live, there is still our genetic affinities which must be reckoned with. Hence the conscious mind may well be trained to applaud racial mongrelization easily enough over the course of time but it is another matter altogether as to whether the deed of the organism will follow suit within its own life. Put another way, mental indoctrination and genetic instinct are two different things. The mind may well be conditioned to think a certain way about something but our genes have a ‘mind’ of their own: their genetic code and the propensities of that code. Every creature has an instinctive affinity for those who are like itself; every creature has an instinctive disdain for those who are not like itself. Those who would desire to stamp out that affinity and disdain simply hate the world as it naturally is, even if they would do so in the name of “love. ”

Since the purpose of sex is racial furtherance—literally the casting of the line of the race into the future, the furthering of the race past the life span of the individual person—it follows than that the reason why romantic love exists is that it facilitates that racial furtherance. Our race evolved for romantic love because the presence of romantic love gave it an advantage of some kind in its struggle for life. Perhaps more babies were born to those parents who loved one another romantically than those who did not. Perhaps parents were more apt to defend their progeny from harm from the elements and from other creatures if they loved one another romantically than otherwise. In any event, romantic love is a means to an end for our race just like every other facet of our racial life, that end being the furtherance of the race itself. Romantic love is thus, again, not a gift to us from an interstellar “god” any more than any other of the facets of our world; rather it is simply a means by which the race is furthered in its life. Our race derived evolutionary advantage from the presence of romantic love; thus romantic love became part of our genetic nature, indeed more of our nature than that of any other race upon this earth. It is the White people who love romantically the most. In the Negro on the other hand, romantic love is hardly present at all; it is almost a matter of indifference which “woman” a Negro takes and marital fidelity was practically non-existent in sub-Saharan Africa as a result. In the Oriental it is greater than that of the Negro but still weak—perhaps because there is so little genetic variation between the individuals of that race; one Chinaman, Japanese, Vietnamese, or whatever is about the same as all the rest. There is thus little to no reason for an Oriental to love this or that individual specimen to the exclusion of all others; there is no reason to pine for this or that particular individual since they are all about the same anyway. Thus it was inevitable that Orientals would come to be capable of less romantic love than our own race would; the specialness of the selected mate is lacking and there is little to no reason to favor a particular Oriental mate romantically accordingly. Thus arranged marriages—common to Oriental countries historically—make a certain amount of sense; parents may as well choose the mates of their children alone since there is very little individual distinction between the members of that race and thus romantic love is less of a factor there. It is stupid, as always, to assume that every race values the same things as every other; rather, in a natural state of affairs, the values of a particular race follow its particular nature and the respective characteristics that it bears. When we consider that romantic love is the pining for a specific person, to the exclusion of all others, it is little to be wondered at that there will be less romantic love the less that the individuals of a particular race differ from one another in a physiological sense. If every potential mate is about the same as another, it is difficult for the specialization of love to occur, specialization which manifests itself with a high degree of romantic feeling.

As always, the facets of life in this world have a biological basis. They are not some kind of happenstance or coincidence. It is not some kind of fluke that males are attracted to females and vice versa. It is not some kind of coincidence that different races have different attributes. What made each race the way it is was its biological evolution, with the environment merely acting upon its genes as they are. Our environment thus cannot alter our particular, intrinsic genetic natures; it can only manipulate them for certain ends. The genes remain the same; a monkey in a suit is still a monkey. As the present society would have it, different creatures can be rendered the same simply by throwing them together within the same environment and pretending that they are all “equal” to one another. That, however, is not the case and has never been. The genes which compose us make us what we are. Different genes mean different creatures. If I build a house out of brick, it is not the same as a house made out of wood. Trying to pretend that they are can only go so far. In a sense, the entire history of the world can be summed up as a struggle between those who accept the reality of the world as it is and those who would resist that reality and seek to alter it to conform to how they would like it to be. In their view, there shouldn’t be any difference between the races and sexes and so there aren’t any as far as they are concerned. They want everybody to be the same and so they contrive that “reality” in their minds. Their wish thus becomes the parent to their thought. That is no different though from calling a spoonful of dirt “chocolate”: it is still dirt whether you call it chocolate or not. You can pour it into your milk and expect it to taste like chocolate but it won’t. You can even lie to yourself and others about the quality of its taste but the objective fact that it is not chocolate remains. No matter how much self-deception is employed within the present society of ours when it comes to race, sex, or whatever, the objective fact remains that every creature is what it is, that different genetic structures mean different genetic natures, and that different genetic natures are not and cannot be “the same” as one another. Different creatures naturally have different roles to play in life accordingly as a result of their different natures, and the action of every creature follows from its function and its form. The very existence of more than one sex in a race for instance implies that those sexes are to perform different functions within their lives rather than mimic one another under the misguided belief that they are “the same” as one another. Different anatomy means different roles to play in the endeavor to fulfill the racially furtherative meaning of life. There is thus far more at work when it comes to race and sex than the content of mere conscious thoughts. There is, rather, the yearning of a race to live.

Thus, in light of the above, it really should not be a surprise that men are more sexually attracted to broad-hipped and big-chested women for instance than they are to narrow-hipped and flat-chested women: there is an instinctive desire for a mate who is not as likely to die in childbirth and who can provide plenty of nourishment for their offspring. What people erroneously assume is merely a shallow preference based upon sexual desire is actually an instinctive yearning for that breeding which will ensure the survival of his kind. Curvature in a woman is a recipe for survival and is thus desired accordingly, even if we do not consciously happen to understand why. Nor can we blame a man for desiring a woman whose sexual characteristics are different from his in general; no matter what her “personality” may be, there is obviously more to breeding than what a prospective mate thinks. It is not a matter of men “objectifying” women per se; it is a matter of men choosing the best women they can for breeding purposes, an activity more important than any other he could possibly engage in when it comes to the racial furtherance that is the meaning of his life. By a similar token, women are instinctively inclined to favor those men who can provide for them and their future offspring; no matter how great his “ideals” and his mind may be, the main thing is that any potential offspring derive biological advantage from the union. He who can create and secure a comfortable nest is the one who will be favored, not the revolutionary for instance who has very little regard for his physical surroundings and couldn’t care less about material pleasures. It is not surprising then that women are inclined to favor men with money instead of those without, nor is that inclination worthy of reproach, for what is at stake is not merely her own material comfort as one may erroneously assume but rather the welfare of the beings that she may bear within her womb, a welfare that may be secured by material means. A man cannot expect a woman to care about what he himself cares about, or vice versa, because a man’s instinct is only to obtain genetic offspring while a woman’s is to make sure that it is provided for. So of course women are naturally more materialistic than men. So of course men care more about how a woman looks than a woman cares about how men look. That is because the instinctive goal is different for the respective sexes. The difference of sex means the difference of goal, though the end result remains the same as always: the furtherance of the race. The respective sexes obtain that furtherance in different ways: men have the overwhelming desire to inseminate and to do so with women who stimulate them for that endeavor—hence why the looks of women are so important to men—while women have the desire to be inseminated by those men who will provide the best environment possible for that “seed. ” By providing a different emphasis, a different instinct, to each sex, Nature increases the odds that the race will indeed be furthered. On the other hand, were men and women both genetically programmed to desire copulation and nothing more—as is the case with men alone as it stands—innumerable offspring would be born into environments ill-conducive to their survival and would die as a result. Conversely, were both men and women concerned exclusively with the securing of a good environment for their offspring—as women alone tend to be—few offspring would be born at all since men are the active party, women the passive one, when it comes to copulation.

⇐ Предыдущая 8 9 10 11 121314 15 16 17 Следующая ⇒