The Triumph of Life: An Assault Upon the Values of the Current Society 12 страница

Whereas a career away from the home may be necessary to demonstrate the value of a man, no such career is therefore necessary to demonstrate the value of a woman; it exists inherently in her ability to bring new life into the world, replenishing the race in its life. It exists in her cultivation of that life. It exists in her easing the cares and concerns of her husband as he fights to provide for his family in a harsh and competitive world. The home is not some sort of artificial entity lacking value; rather, the very word “home” connotes a place of great value. People would be fools to disparage what it means to have a happy and healthy home; indeed, the point of our labor in the first place, fundamentally, is to help procure that very thing. While it is true that men have pursuits that they wish to pursue, callings which drive them to produce, create, and organize the world in a particular way, there is no reason why women cannot do the same thing within their own sphere. Physical presence away from the home is unnecessary to make an impact outside that home, nor is it necessary for women to attend college in order to obtain knowledge. Rather, if anything, the ability of women to live fulfilling lives within the homes they have created for their families is greater today than ever before. Knowledge, entertainment, and culture can be brought literally into the home from the outside and the only thing women “miss out on” by being stay-at-home wives and mothers is the practice of not being the boss of their own time and laboring for people who are not their own family which are dubious “perks” of outside employment indeed. In sum, woman is by no means “deprived” by virtue of her attending to the home of her family and not being employed elsewhere. Rather, she is able to master her own sphere of being and shape the lives of her husband and children best. She has more power by doing that than she has by “juggling” family and career; people seem to forget that the usual result of juggling is all three balls on the floor. When women ape the lives of men, all they do is lessen themselves, diminish their value, and make themselves a jack of all trades all right but a master of none. They have less influence upon our world.

Fundamentally the wants and desires of our people today, regardless of sex, are by and large the product of the racially hostile indoctrination they have received and incurred rather than the realization of their actual, instinctive, intrinsic selves. The mania for a college degree is an excellent example of that: people do not go to college because they, as a matter of instinct or self-reflection, think that that is a good idea but rather because it has been drilled into them that a college education is the only way to get ahead in an economically competitive world. The fact of the matter though is that everything learned at college can just as easily be learned at home if not more so, and that a college education can be positively harmful to minds which are molded to hate their own White Race—its past, present, and future—by professors who themselves are afflicted with that virus of self-hatred. In any event, everything that our people believe in regarding sex and the sexes today is, like the idea of a college education, drummed into them in order to reach an end which is hostile to their racial preservation instead of beneficial to that preservation and that is, in the end, the only thing that matters in that regard. Are more White babies born by virtue of our women going off to college and having careers than by marrying early and staying in the home? Obviously not, and from a racially preservative standpoint—the only standpoint which can have any natural validity to it at all as we have established—that is the only thing that matters. Nor for that matter is it beneficial to our racial preservation for many of our men to go off to college either, focusing on their ensuing “careers, ” when they view women at best as entertainment and a diversion in the process and do not marry and do not breed. In sum, the priorities of both our men and women have become muddled and confused; the end of our personal, individual existence—the furtherance of the race—has been substituted for what are, at best, various means to an end which have little to do with our racial furtherance at all. Racial preservation is, in fact, not even part of the equation at all anymore; having a child is seen as some sort of rite of passage, at best, which can be put off until one, perhaps, gets around to it, if ever. Women have just become men without penises who (“unfortunately”) have uteruses which might (“accidentally”) be used sometime—kind of like an old car in the garage—but who really need to focus instead on being a good employee for someone else somewhere in order to find “fulfillment. ” Men, for their part, are to pursue sexual relations for their own sake without even the thought of an end. The whole situation is a comedy of errors that unfortunately is not funny. Our race is dying because of it; hence why it must be addressed. This world is for the living, not the dead. We change the current situation or we perish.

None of this is to say that our women need be in the home all the time. It is to say that our race is better preserved when she is not spending eight hours of her day and more working for someone else but is instead spending her entire day working exclusively for her family and her home, bringing new life into the world and cultivating that life. No matter how smug people may be today at the notion of women now assuming literally every calling and profession which formerly belonged to that of men alone, there is a reason why that had never been the practice until recently and that things had been different for countless thousands of years. Anyone can pound a square block into a round hole if he wants to but that doesn’t mean that there won’t be damage to both the block and the hole. Woman’s creation of new life—new life for the race—is of such stupendous importance that only an idiot would denigrate that importance in favor of a mere “career, ” a “career” which few people if any will remember after she herself has lost her life. We do not need our women in combat boots to defend our race. We need our women to replenish the life that is constantly lost. We do not need to serve an international economy. We need an economy which serves exclusively our racial life. We do not need full employment of every man and women away from the home. We need full employment of every (healthy) man as the earner of his family’s sustenance and full employment of every (healthy) woman as the cultivator of that sustenance. It has never been in a woman’s nature to be just like a man or vice versa. It is in the nature of men and women to further the race in their own way. The knowledge and experiences that we have as individuals are transitory. The life of our race however is eternal—but only so long as we do our job. The pain which women endure in childbirth is matched by the pain which men endure over a lifetime of earning the family’s living by the sweat of his brow, and by his being willing to shed his blood in the defense of his race in battle. A little of him dies every time he spews forth his seed but by doing so, his race continues to live. Fundamentally then, both sex and the sexes have been horribly misunderstood. Copulation is not something obscene or vulgar, but nor is it “carnal” either. It is the will of a race to continue to live, and the individuals of that race make sacrifices so as to make that life possible. That is how the meaning of life of this world is fulfilled, not by obeisance to the fads and trappings of the present artificial age. Each one of us comes into the world with the potential to cause the creation of new life, life which will survive us when we are gone. That is the only immortality we can ever know and thus the only immortality deserving of everything we can give to it. Far from being some sort of badge of inferior status, a woman’s motherhood then is the very acme of creative existence upon which her entire world—and our entire society—should revolve.

Let us be honest with ourselves: when a woman puts makeup on her face, what is she doing? She is trying to make herself more attractive for mating purposes. When she puts lipstick on her lips, what is she doing? She is trying to simulate what a woman’s lips look like during copulation. When she shows great care for her wardrobe, it is because she is trying to look good for a potential mate. When a man tries to impress a woman with feats of strength, demonstrations of his wealth, or evidence of his intellect, what is he trying to do? He is trying to get into her pants or up her skirt! That’s just the way it is, though people would deny it. Sex is the goal of all of these displays, even if only subconsciously. That is because the very purpose of the sexes themselves is sex, the reproduction of the race. There is no shame involved in any of this. Rather, it is the way of the world. Just as the sexes try to impress one another for sexual purposes in the natural world, the races of men seek to do likewise. A woman’s colorful mode of dress, for example, is the equivalent of a male bird’s feathers and a man’s bravado, for its part, is a kind of courtship display. That’s why these things take place. Women wear skirts because men find their legs attractive, wear bras because men find firm breasts more attractive than drooping ones, and (used to) wear corsets because the hourglass figure is instinctively desired by men too. In our race, it so happens that sexual allurement is shared by the respective sexes, unlike in birds where the males alone seek to impress the females for mating purposes. In other words, men and women seek to attract each other. The purpose is to facilitate breeding whether we are conscious of it or not. So-called “fashion” is just a renaming of a far more basic drive.

Notably, the recent widespread usage of the word “gender” in regards to the sexes is misplaced: there are only sexes when it comes to biology, not “genders, ” and the word “gender” is itself only applicable to grammar, not people. Thus there are masculine, feminine, and neuter genders in various languages, not in people. The erroneous usage of the word “gender” has thus helped to obscure the entire issue of sex, the sexes, and what their purpose is. That may well be in fact why the sexes suddenly, out of nowhere, began to be called “genders” by the controlled news media in the early 1990’s: the intent was to destroy the relationship between the sexes and sexual copulation in the minds of the people, to destroy the notion that men are men, women are women, and that their lives should naturally vary from one another accordingly. Instead, they became mere “genders” and thus assumed a quasi-artificial existence. The manipulators of the public mind wanted to belittle the all-important issue of sex to that of mere “gender” and then subsequently sought to convince the people that the entire matter of sex and the sexes is fungible, that there really aren’t “sexes, ” that the “genders” are interchangeable, that men can “identify” as women and women can “identify” as men, and that sexuality itself is a mere “cultural” construct. All of this was designed to weaken our race in its life and to confuse our people as to their purpose as the sexual, racial beings that they are. It is a perversion of that which is natural and normal to human life. Now we have boys who wish to use girls’ bathrooms and the like. After all, it’s just a matter of “gender, ” isn’t it? No, it isn’t, but when the people are constantly propagandized to the contrary, it is inevitable that any kind of understanding for these matters will be undermined and our race will suffer from such idiocy as a result. The fact of the matter is that anyone who has a penis is a man and anyone who has a vagina is a woman and that any conception to the contrary is the true “cultural construct” here. Whatever sexual confusion exists in today’s world is a result of the artificial society we have devised for ourselves and the consequences which spring therefrom. It is not a result of Nature. Nature does not evince any ambiguity in such things. Foolish human beings, however, would fail to appreciate the stark fact that they alone suffer from a sexual confusion which is nowhere else to be found among the other races of life on this planet. Human beings, in their arrogance, fool themselves into thinking that human life is somehow inherently detached from all other life, that the biological principles which apply to every other living creature on earth somehow do not apply to them. That is the only way one can explain how people could be so stupid as to think that a boy could be a girl, a Larry could be a Mary, just because he thinks that that is what he is. The DNA, however, does not lie, nor is it confused. It is merely an indictment of our so-called “modern” society that any such sexual confusion, nay idiocy, exists in the first place. Reality is not determined by what people think. Rather, it is determined by what genetically is. Anybody can be duped into believing anything. That does not, however, make it so.

Without the infliction of the Christian religion upon the White world, we can very much doubt whether sex, or nudity for that matter, would have ever been viewed as such a big deal in a negative way. It is Christianity, after all, which declared sex to be a “sin” and declared the naked human body to be “indecent. ” (See e. g. I Corinthians 7: 1: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman. ”) Needless to say, there are no such inhibitions about sex and nudity in the natural world; rather, literally every creature is naked and has sex and couldn’t care less about the existence of any so-called “moral” doctrines which would declare that to be wrong. We can ask ourselves then why the viewing of a naked human body should have any more significance than the viewing of an animal one. We can ask ourselves why being naked should be such a source of embarrassment and shame for human beings alone. We can ask ourselves what is the big deal displaying parts of a body which millions of other creatures of our race likewise possess. We can ask ourselves why sex and nakedness is such a big deal in a prurient way for us when they are so basic to the lives of every other animate creature on earth. Okay, a woman has breasts and a man doesn’t and a man has a penis and a woman doesn’t. So what? Didn’t we already know what? We can ask ourselves why the viewing of a human sexual organ should be any more problematic than the viewing of a human hand or a leg, or why the matter of human nakedness should be so uniquely fraught with such embarrassment, shame, or titillation for that matter.

On the other hand, what is important for our purposes is that it is the concealment of our bodies which has led to their degeneration, for who can deny that all of us would take better care of ourselves physically—and would be less tolerant of whatever defects we possess—if we had to traverse the world in the nude? The lack of clothes would actually shame us, in a positive way, into living a more healthy existence, including our consumption of healthier foods, and that would obviously be a good thing, not bad. All of the bizarre titillation which some of our people feel today at the prospect of seeing people of the opposite sex naked would disappear in short order once naked people were everywhere; the draw of pornography, a truly bizarre perversion when the matter is given a second thought, would disappear likewise. (What creature in the natural world leers at a naked fellow member of its own kind or derives enjoyment from watching it copulate with another being? Only human beings are so strange! ) Fundamentally then it is unnatural in the first place for the mere sight of a human body to invoke a prurient interest. This is because nakedness is the rule in Nature, not the exception. Creatures in the natural world see each other naked all the time without their going nuts about it. Copulation in the natural world does not occur because of nakedness. Rather, it occurs because of the instinctive drive to further the race in its life.

⁕ ⁕ ⁕

It follows from what has been stated in the pages above that the validity of certain additional facets of our society must be reconsidered if we are interested in living in accordance with the values of the natural world, values which are geared to the preservation and furtherance of our racial life unlike those artificial morals, customs, laws, and habits which have been arbitrarily imposed upon us in contravention of that life. In essence, every problem—or perceived problem—of our world is a result of our not living in accordance with natural values and thus are the spawn of that error. What passes for the important issues of our day are all too often really just the product of the unnatural values which have been socially imposed upon us; we are indoctrinated to believe that this or that matters and so we do. We pile layer upon layer upon an already faulty edifice and yet are shocked when things collapse and do not turn out as well as we think they should.

Let us begin with the problem of so-called “sexual harassment in the workplace, ” a phenomenon which few people if any had ever heard of until a mere two generations ago, at most. People don’t even stop to consider why this perceived problem exists only now in the first place, the fact that we have driven women into the workplace where they did not, and rightly so, used to be. The solution to “sexual harassment in the workplace” is thus an obvious one: get women the hell out of the workplace! No sexual harassment of women in the workplace will occur when they have been restored to their rightful place and status within the home, nor will it occur when the racially furtherative purpose of sexual relations has been universally restored, understood, and embraced. As we have established, it is idiotic to expect men not to have a sexual interest in women; it is idiotic to expect men not to look at them with copulation in mind. Thus the putting of men and women together in a workplace was problematic from the start and it is even more problematic to seek to punish men for evincing instincts towards women which obviously come natural to them. The question is begged: just how many laws, rules, and regulations are we going to have to impose upon our people in order to de-racinate them, de-sexualize them, and otherwise force them into conduct which goes against their natural instincts and their natural selves? Furthermore, as we have stated, it is natural for our men and women to be paired off with one another much earlier than that which is occurring today and thus for that reason as well, “sexual harassment” between the sexes anywhere is merely an aberration of the artificial society in which we live; whatever “sexual harassment” used to occur within our race was a rare thing because our men and women were not working together in a close environment and would have already been “taken” by that point in marriage—and woe betide the man who would “sexually harass” a married woman who could and would call upon her husband and male relatives for aid. It was understood that a married woman—as nearly all women were before they had hit the age of twenty—belonged to her husband and a married man belonged to his wife. Thus there was an acknowledged and recognized bond between our men and women as mates and spouses which made “sexual harassment” by outside parties morally, psychologically, and spatially prohibitive. The bond of matrimony meant something, to everybody. A man did not want a woman who had already been inseminated by another man; he had enough pride and esteem in himself that he was uninterested in “dining at someone else’s table. ” Hence why a virginal wife actually used to mean something and why the bride wore white. There was a belief in purity—not only racial purity but also sexual purity—a purity which precluded interest in the kind of sexual free for all which we witness in the society of today.

Thus “sexual harassment in the workplace” is an unnatural phenomenon. Even if it were natural for women to be in a workplace—which it isn’t—they would have been paired off with their husbands—husbands whose job it is to protect them—before that participation in the workplace ever occurred. There would be no sense in “sexually harassing” a woman who has already been possessed by another man, and in any case it is her husband to whom she would complain were that to occur, not her “boss” and not the State. (Notably, the only natural boss for a woman is her family. It is her family that a woman works for in the natural order of things and nobody else. ) Since copulation is for breeding purposes—having babies—what exactly is the point of sexually harassing a woman if you don’t plan on giving her children? None at all, and that would be understood in a society whose values have been realigned with those of the natural world. There is not “sexual harassment” in that natural world; rather, a female either accepts a male’s sexual overtures or sends him packing. A female’s mate does not just stand there and let another male have his way with her; rather, he fights off all those who would deprive him of his possession. Mere words, for their part, don’t mean much; there used to be a time when words—at least to a woman—mattered a whole lot less than what people did. We seem to have forgotten all about the old saying, “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. ” We would be wise to recall it, but also to recall that nobody else can uphold our personal honor in the first instance but we ourselves. Being weak is not praiseworthy when it comes to the words we may be subjected to. We have a White Race today which coddles weakness all the way around instead of extolling strength.

We put unmarried men and women together in a confined space—men and women who have suppressed their natural, instinctive drive to breed offspring during their teens as they are genetically driven to do—and yet are surprised when the men make sexual overtures to the women and vice versa. How stupid is that? Every creature only does what it is compelled to do, according to its inherent character, in the (artificial) situation in which it finds itself; the imposition of arbitrary rules upon it can only go so far in modifying that conduct which comes naturally to it. We can suppress the natural instincts of our men and women in order to make them conform to an artificial order of things but what is the benefit of that exactly? What is punished today will only have to be punished again tomorrow and on and on. A woman wears a short skirt and wonders why a man is looking at her bottom half and not her top; she complains that he has “objectified” her when she has, of course, “objectified” herself in a society which has shunned any form of nakedness which isn’t for titillation purposes and where our people are generally denied the naked human form which comes naturally to them as a matter of course. There is nothing wrong with that of course—that the woman has objectified herself—but let us be honest with ourselves: the woman wants to be looked at, even if that sentiment on her part is only subconsciously (instinctively) held. Suppressing our natural instincts and desires only forces them into unnatural, unwelcome channels which fail to further the race in its struggle for life. Instead we have the thwarting of the purpose for why sex exists in the first place. The day will come when it will be recognized that nearly all aberrant behavior in this world—no matter what it may be—is merely a result of our failing to embrace the values of a natural life. To deny or postpone a natural drive for an indefinite period of time is to mutilate it into something else.

We can see then why the failure to appreciate the purpose for why sexual relations exist at all—the furtherance of the race—has negative consequences, for if you do not recognize the purpose of something, you will quite likely misuse it too. If people do not understand that sex exists so that the race may be furthered, for example, it is little to be wondered at that they will waste their time “sexually harassing” people with whom they have no interest or intention whatever of breeding new racial life (offspring), use “contraception” when they do copulate, think that the abortion (slaughter) of their children is a matter of mere personal choice, and fail to choose a mate for the purpose of good breeding which is the only sensible way in which our intelligence and sophistication as human beings may be employed for a sexual purpose in the first place. It is little to be wondered at that people do not understand their own sexual feelings, or misinterpret them if they do, or that they engage in “marriages” in which the race is neither furthered nor intended to be furthered. No, none of these things are surprising at all. People fail to understand that the reason for love is racial furtherance, the reason for lust is racial furtherance, the reason for jealousy is racial furtherance, and likewise with every other feeling or emotion under the sun when it comes to the intrinsic sexual impulses which we harbor. We want to breed so that we may live on in a genetic sense. It is silly then to condemn these sentiments and impulses in themselves; the most that can be said is that they are today being routinely misapplied. “Sexual harassment” is itself nonsensical in a natural scheme of things, for in the natural world the prospective mate is won over, not “harassed. ”

As for sexual assault, what is first important to understand, as always, is that all of us are meant to breed with our chosen mates after the onset of puberty, not wait years and even decades later. Thus, in a natural scheme of things, there is no such thing as unfulfilled, shunted aside sexual desire, unfulfilled sexual desire which manifests itself as sexual assault. Sexual assault is, in other words, the product of sexual impulses which have failed to be satisfied; it is unnatural for a man to want to assault a woman when he already has a mate who fulfills his racially furtherative sexual impulses. To be sure, there are men who possess genetic anomalies which cause them to exhibit deviant behavior but that is a different matter; the solution there is to weed out those genetic defects within the race so that such deviants will no longer exist. Otherwise though, the solution to sexual assault is the early marrying of our population, the embrace of sex for its racially furtherative purpose and condemnation of its usage for hedonistic purposes, and our attack upon the entire individualistic way of looking at the world generally. Since the entire point of sexual copulation is the breeding of children, there is no point in sexually assaulting someone with whom you do not plan on having children. Abortion, for its part, can be used as a corrective measure to discourage those very, very few men who would commit rape in an effort to sire a child while a simple slap in the face is the natural response to those who would, more innocently, place their hands merely where they are unwanted; we should not always be looking to the laws of the State for our protection when every creature has an innate right of its own to defend and uphold its dignity and its honor. Women are not the helpless creatures that society has made them out to be. Every woman rather has the obligation to resist her assaulter with all of the vehemence which the situation in question demands; otherwise she has no cause for complaint afterwards for what has occurred. The criminal code, for its part, must punish the clear, resisted, violent rape of a woman with absolute ruthlessness—not because her feelings have been hurt so much as because violent copulation against a woman’s will fails to ensure the creation of a racially furtherative member of our White Race in any respect. Both she and society are deprived of the prerogative to choose and tailor her breeding in a racially furtherative manner; the odds are strong that if she had to be taken by force, the man in question is not a being beneficial to a superior humanity. Furthermore, a woman can hardly be expected to share a life with her rapist as his wife when she had no say in her copulation with him in the first place. The only natural breeding rather is the breeding of choice. Throughout the natural world, creatures choose their mates thus enabling selection of the best specimens, generation by generation. Willy-nilly breeding, in its literal sense, fails to further a race, at least among human life where there is more at issue than raw physical strength standing alone; a dumb brute may well be able to overpower a woman and copulate with her against her will but that does not mean that we as White people want more dumb brutes in our gene pool. Rather, among White human life—life that is filled with creative genius and the idealistic pursuit of greatness—only conscious, deliberate, selective, and educative breeding can be relied upon to accomplish that racial furtherance. It must be two-sided, not one-sided, and it must be voluntary and mutually desired in order for the progeny to be a harmonious being at peace with itself and its world.

⇐ Предыдущая 10 11 12 13 141516 17 18 19 Следующая ⇒