|
|||
Deny PostureСтр 1 из 3Следующая ⇒
Conzeptualizing Crisis Communikation
Crisis communication is composed of:
Pre-crisis: composed of actions organizations take before crisis over occurs: 1) prevention: identify and reduce risk. Form of risk:
2) preparation: CMPlan, exercises that simulate a crisis experience Team must to create a crises sing network (knowledge network)
Crisis response: when crisis hits:
The 4 keys features of form: 1. be quick 2. avoid”no Comment” 3. be accurate 4. be consistent (speak with one voice)
1. be quick: Org. must get its message very fast. Silence and passive response allow other to tell the story and to control the discussion of crisis. 2. avoid”no Comment”: if you don’t have an answer to a question, say that you don’t have the information and promise to answer the question when you get the relevant Information. 4. be consistent (speak with one voice): all who speak for the organization have the same knowledge. It helps to create the consistent message. Content: what the crisis massage should communicate. The central goals of crisis response comm.:
Post-crisis strategies: 1) Instruction information say what to do protect themselves from crisis. Organization must warn customers of any danger. 2) adjusting information: psychological stress as effect from crisis. Crisis managers should provide a summary of the event and outline of what actions are being taken. 3) reputation repair
Value of Reputation: favorable and unfavorable Corporate Apologia: 4 strategies:
1) opinion: that its just opinion and don’t match the facts of the situation. People will see that is no crisis or connection to the organization. 2) individual group: tries to defect some responsibility from the organization by blaming only a part of the organization for the crisis. 3) act essence: accept the reasonability but says that crisis doesn’t represent really org.
Impression management: - excuse, avoiding responsibility - justification, accept responsibility for the act but not the consequence of the act - ingratiation, try to build stakeholder support or approval - intimidation, threat of action again a person or group - apology, accept responsibility and accept a punishment - denouncement, claim some other party is responsible - factual distortion, inf. is untrue
Image Restoration Theory: - corporate communication is conceptualized as a goal directed activity - maintain a positive reputation
Benoit’s (1995) Image Restoration Strategies 1) Denial: Simple Denial: there is no crisis Shift the blame: so other agent is responsible for crisis 2) Evading Responsibility: Provocation: crisis was the result of response to some one else’s action Defeasibility: lack of information about events leading to the crisis situation Accidental: lack of control over events leading to the crisis situation Good intention: organization meant to do well 3) Reducing Offensiveness Bolstering: remind stakeholders of the organization’s positive qualities Minimize: try to reduce the perceived offensiveness of crisis by saying it was minor Differentiation: try to offensiveness of crisis by comparing to similar, more serious one Transcendence: place fact in a different more favorable context Attack Accuser: attack those who claim a crisis exists Compensation: organization offers money or goods to victims 4) Corrective Action: organization tries to restore the situation to pre act status and/or promise change prevent a repeat of the act 5) Mortification: organization admits responsibility, asks for forgiveness and expresses regret (
SCCT Crisis Response Strategies by Posture Deny Posture Attack the accuser обвини́ тель: crisis manager confronts the person or group clamming something wrong with the org. “The org. threatened to sue the people who claim a crisis occurred” Denial: manager says that crisis is no crisis “The org. said that no crisis event occurred” Scapegoal: someone else outside blames for crisis.
|
|||
|