References

1. Webster J., Osborne S., Rickard C. M. & New K. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 4, CD007798, doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD007798. pub3 (2013). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

2. Kumar M., Vandermeer B., Bassler D. & Mansoor N. Low-dose heparin use and the patency of peripheral IV catheters in children: a systematic review. Pediatrics 131, e864–872, doi: 10. 1542/peds. 2012-2403 (2013). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

3. Flint A., McIntosh D. & Davies M. W. Continuous infusion versus intermittent flushing to prevent loss of function of peripheral intravenous catheters used for drug administration in newborn infants. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, CD004593, doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD004593. pub2 (2005). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

4. Shah P. S., Ng E. & Sinha A. K. Heparin for prolonging peripheral intravenous catheter use in neonates. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, CD002774, doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD002774. pub2 (2005). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

5. Niel-Weise B. S., Stijnen T. & van den Broek P. J. Should in-line filters be used in peripheral intravenous catheters to prevent infusion-related phlebitis? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesia and analgesia 110, 1624–1629, doi: 10. 1213/ANE. 0b013e3181da8342 (2010). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

6. Gillies D. et al.. Optimal timing for intravenous administration set replacement. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, CD003588, doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD003588. pub2 (2005). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

7. Lysakowski C., Dumont L., Tramer M. R. & Tassonyi E. A needle-free jet-injection system with lidocaine for peripheral intravenous cannula insertion: a randomized controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. Anesthesia and analgesia 96, 215–219, table of contents (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Uman L. S. et al.. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 10, CD005179, doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD005179. pub3 (2013). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

9. Masud S. et al.. Contribution of a heating element to topical anesthesia patch efficacy prior to vascular access: results from two randomized, double-blind studies. Journal of pain and symptom management 40, 510–519, doi: 10. 1016/j. jpainsymman. 2010. 01. 022 (2010). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

10. Hijazi R., Taylor D. & Richardson J. Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Bmj 338, b215, doi: 10. 1136/bmj. b215 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

11. Prien T. Intradermal anaesthesia: comparison of several compounds. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 38, 805–807 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Vaghadia H., al-Ahdal O. A. & Nevin K. EMLA patch for intravenous cannulation in adult surgical outpatients. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d’anesthesie 44, 798–802 (1997). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Cooper J. A., Bromley L. M., Baranowski A. P. & Barker S. G. Evaluation of a needle-free injection system for local anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation. Anaesthesia 55, 247–250 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Suren M. et al.. Comparison of the use of the Valsalva maneuver and the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA(R)) to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of anesthesia 27, 407–411, doi: 10. 1007/s00540-012-1540-1 (2013). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

15. Webster J., Gillies D., O’Riordan E., Sherriff K. L. & Rickard C. M. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, CD003827, doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD003827. pub2 (2011). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

16. Lenhardt R., Seybold T., Kimberger O., Stoiser B. & Sessler D. I. Local warming and insertion of peripheral venous cannulas: single blinded prospective randomised controlled trial and single blinded randomised crossover trial. Bmj 325, 409–410 (2002). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Meyer B. A., Little C. J., Thorp J. A., Cohen G. R. & Yeast J. D. Heparin versus normal saline as a peripheral line flush in maintenance of intermittent intravenous lines in obstetric patients. Obstetrics and gynecology 85, 433–436, doi: 10. 1016/0029-7844(94)00409-7 (1995). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

18. Niesen K. M., Harris D. Y., Parkin L. S. & Henn L. T. The effects of heparin versus normal saline for maintenance of peripheral intravenous locks in pregnant women. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing: JOGNN/NAACOG 32, 503–508 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Robinson P. A., Carr S., Pearson S. & Frampton C. Lignocaine is a better analgesic than either ethyl chloride or nitrous oxide for peripheral intravenous cannulation. Emergency medicine Australasia: EMA 19, 427–432, doi: 10. 1111/j. 1742-6723. 2007. 01008. x (2007). [PubMed] [CrossRef

] [Google Scholar]

20. Dupont W. D. & Plummer W. D. Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Controlled clinical trials 11, 116–128 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Hendry F., Checketts M. R. & McLeod G. A. Effect of intradermal anaesthesia on success rate and pain of intravenous cannulation: a randomized non-blind crossover study. Scottish medical journal 56, 210–213, doi: 10. 1258/smj. 2011. 011160 (2011). [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

⇐ Предыдущая 1 2 345 Следующая ⇒