Super-Cremation and the Bischoff Document

By Carl Tompkins

[PART 1 of 3: ]

I have recently encountered a shill job regarding the burning capacity of the crematoria II, III, IV and V at Auschwitz-Birkenau. And the " lynch-pin" often brought up is the " Bischoff document" which I would like to discuss for the benefit of the board members wherever this lie is encountered in public or on shill sites.

The " cremation" issue is the most absurd part of the Holocaust story at all locations alleged. But the liars will try to claim, very bizarrely, the opposite (with obviously no further elaboration at first).

The reason is at the very beginning of the Auschwitz propaganda- it quickly slid from 9 million deaths- to 4 million. 4 million was settled on for their propaganda routine at war crimes trials- and became official Soviet and Polish propaganda until the collapse of the Soviet Union circa 1990. At this point the then extant " 2 versions" of the Holocaust Myth (Jewish-American, and Soviet-Polish) collapsed to just the Jewish-American version taking over the role in Auschwitz- which is the source of the tension between Jew's and Pole's today on the issue. And with a concomitant reduction in deaths (to 1. 5 million, then straight away to 1. 1 million with 960, 000 Jew's inclusive)- i. e. the figures conceded were the Polish/Russian deaths- not the Jewish ones. In other words the Polish/Soviet half of the lie collapsed with the Soviet Union, not the Jewish-American half.

The Soviet shill job at the time of solidifying the hoax in the form of show trial verdicts coached and utilized several professional lie-witnesses- the most important of which was " Henryk Tauber" - THE key lie-witness for Birkenau and also produces as was their trademark the most absurd and abundant falsified documents of the hoax.

Both the lie-witnesses (Tauber) and the documents falsified (and those falsely represented) were connected inextricably with the 4 million propaganda and it can be shown- collapsed with it.

For the purpose of this discussion we will ignore Tauber and the 4 million propaganda connections and focus on the " Bischoff document" which is the most commonly used shill the liars use to establish an impossibly high burning rate at 4-5x reality. This was even more necessary when the propaganda was at 4 million than it is today, which is why Van Pelt comfortably states that " the actual burning rate was only about half the [lie] reality of 9 bodies per hour!! Which is what the Bischoff document claims- that you can burn 9 bodies per hour per muffle- or 1 body every 7 and a half minutes- think about how absurd that is!

But since people believe it and liars use it it should be analyzed. For example- Judge Gray at the Irving Lipstadt trial " believed" it- since it was one of the " major" pieces of evidence presented by Van Pelt! And was the major lynch pins he plageurised from Pressac.

The Bischoff document is of course a forgery. Using the heirarchy of evidence [image] We will use higher forms first (laws of nature + technical possibility) to refute the document before considering equal documentary forms.

The best holocaust scholar in the world- the truthful Italian guy Rev. Prof. Carlo Mattogno- refutes it with the following evidence here...

http: //holocausthandbooks. com/dl/22-trcfa. pdf

Chapter 8. 6 " Duration of the Cremation Process in the Topf Ovens at Birkenau" Pages 272-282.

The convergence of evidence to establish " reality" of 1 body per hour is...

1) The results of Kessler’s cremation experiments with coke of January 5, 1927.

2) A fragment of the list of cremations in the Gusen crematorium.

3) Numerous fragments of the lists concerning the Westerbork crematorium.

4) The practical results achieved in the operation of Koriovens for slaughter-houses constitute another valuable criterion.

5) The Soviet and Polish technical expert reports about the Kori crematorium ovens at Majdanek (August 1944) Stutthof (May 1945) and Sachsenhausen (June 1945) supply further useful indications.

6) Finally, the lists of the cremations in the Terezí n crematorium –which had four naphtha-fired Ignis-Hü ttenbau ovens, no doubt the most efficient ovens built during the Second World War –constitute an essential criterion for the minimum duration of the cremation process as obtainable in the installations existing in German concentration camps in the 1940s.

To which I explicitly add..

7) The fact that prior to WW2- all crematoria could only burn 1 body per hour max, but according to this document technology suddenly was able to cremate 9x that figure! But then suddenly straight after WW2, technology fell back to 1 body per hour again right through to today where modern crematoria can still only perform 1 body per hour! Obviously absurd.

8) There is a " natural limit" of 1 hour per body. All crematoria operate at the " optimum" temperature for combusting a corpse prior to, during and ever since WW2 until today- approx 900 C. The reason is because above this temperature " sintering" occurs with the proteins of the flesh and form a " protective shell" which in fact " increases" the time that it takes to cremate a corpse! This is eventually overcome with a rise in temperature to 1200 C and then it gets quicker and quicker above. The problem is that no such oven ever existed, the required structure involved would need to have been far more stronger and heat resistant than existed in the Topf ovens and the fuel requirement would become exponentially too great. This natural limit is obviously observed throughout which is why modern crema still operate at this temperature today and why they are of course the most obvious criteria.

[CONTINUED IN PART 2]

[PART 2 of 3: ]

Sometimes " modern" crematoria are ridiculously cited as being " incompatible" with the WW2 German ovens for comparative purposes! This idea is absurd on it's face but the shill is nothing more than the fact that modern crematoria taking 2-3 hours to cremate a body is because of heating and cooling in between each body and clean outs in between them. For obvious reasons relating to civilian crematoria.

Revisionists do not claim that this was the case at Auschwitz or anywhere! Which is ridiculously alleged on HDOT for example- which operates by proclaiming a revisionist " claim" that is in fact a straw man to begin with- and then the " facts are" are of course lies that do not even address a revisionist claim.

This is related to another claim that other documents confirm faster burning times. Mattogno produces 4 documents that are relevant to the discussion...

1) a letter from Topf to SS-Neubauleitung of KL Mauthausen dated Nov. 1, 1940

2) a letter from Topf to SS-Neubauleitung of KL Mauthausen dated July 14, 1941

3) an internal memo by engineer Prü fer dated September 8, 1942(see chapter12. 3 ibid. )

4)a letter addressed on June 28, 1943, by the head of ZBL Auschwitz (SS-Sturmbannfü hrer Karl Bischoff) to the head of Amtsgruppe Cof SS-WVHA (SS-Brigadefü hrer Hans Kammler; see chapter 12. 2 ibid. ).

Document 1 is reality. Document 2 is a falsely represented document of the type described just below. Document 3 is a falsely represented document which is shilled to apply cremation capacity for a single set of crema but in reality represents the slew of them. Document 4 is of course the fraudulent Bischoff document.

In the faster times cited case- some " other" crematoria ovens allowed the introduction of a corpse " before" the former corpse was fully cremated. The point being that..

(a) The actual cremation of an individual body is still of course 1 per hour.

(b) The ovens in question at Auschwitz were modified cheaper versions of the oven specified in the document that did not enable such a system of successive corpse loading to achieve the faster than 1 per hour times in succession- which is why these lie-devices are not generally used in succession.

Van Pelt of course ignores the damning document 1 and also the document 2 and presents only 3 which he shills away and does not support his contention when blown and upholds as " Gospel" document 4. Irving- being an idiot re: the holocaust has no idea of these other documents or of any technical criteria himself as an aside.

^Reviewing the evidence by Mattogno establishes the Bischoff document is a fraud on physical and technical grounds.

Moving to documentary evidence- the most common tactic is for the liar to claim that you are " screeching forgery" and dismissing any consideration that the document " can't" be true. Usually in combination with abusing the source (Mattogno) and of course not addressing anything he writes or his own sources which would be suicide for the liar.

The problem is that in order for the liar to claim this- they must THEMSELVES screech forgery about document 1- or explain how it is wrong! Only 1 or the other (ignoring the other 2 here) can be correct of course. One matches reality the other is 9x reality. Other considerations result from the discussions in chapter 12 indicated.

The Bischoff document falls into a category of forgeries used by the Soviets which can be seen generally here..

https: //codoh. com/library/document/961/? lang=en

Of course championed by Pressac and his successor Van Pelt.

We look at Karl Bischoff's Wikipedia article and skim over the propaganda and irrelevant facts...

https: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Karl_Bischoff

We get to this at the end..

" Although almost all of the archives of the Auschwitz building office fell into the hands of the Soviets after the camp was liberated by the Red Army in January 1945, Bischoff remained in the shadows after the war ended. His involvement at Auschwitz went unrecognized until his death in Bremen in 1950. "

No further comment is necessary here; )

The lie-witness Tauber and forced confessor Rudolf Hoess are used always as the key witness to back up the shill claim. You can see Tauber and Hoess demolished here on the issue..

http: //holocausthandbooks. com/dl/22-trcfa. pdf

Part 3 " The Witnesses Henry Tauber and Rudolf Hoess" Pages 367-433

Hoess was of course tortured for 3 days- beaten and whipped to supply his confession not worth citing and Tauber the Soviet coached lie-witness can be seen in the film " Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax" here:

https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=KN4P-YGRbOs

From [34: 25]-[36: 30]

(Note: Holocaust Handbooks are currently unable to supply Eric Hunt's films due to his threats of litigation- if this film is deleted- simply find another good copy on YouTube- and also download and upload as many copies of his films as possible)

^You can see the absurd general claim of Tauber presented in 2 minutes here as well as himself presenting his lies looking completely guilty not at all convincing as pointed out.

In terms of testimonial evidence for reality and against the super cremation shill- we have the German technical experts themselves:

Kurt Prufer:

“In a crematorium with five ovens or 15 openings (muffles), fifteen corpses could be cremated in one hour. ”

Karl Schultze:

“In two crematoria there were five ovens each and into each oven three corpses were introduced at one time, i. e. in one oven there were three openings (muffles). In one hour, in a crematorium with five ovens fifteen corpses could be cremated. ”

Aside from Pressac and Van Pelt, another lie-scholar once threw his hat into the ring with a vacous paper frequently cited. It is " Zimmerman" - here is his paper " Body Disposal at Auschwitz- the End of Holocaust Denial".

https: //phdn. org/... /holocaust... /auschwitz/body-disposal/

This paper and the professor Zimmerman was specifically exposed and all his arguments annihilate by Carlo Mattogno in this book.

http: //holocausthandbooks. com/dl/18-al. pdf

Chapter " An Accountant poses as a Cremation Expert" Pages 89-199

Zimmerman collapsed- no response, hence academic defeat.

It is in fact unbelievable that anybody could possibly believe that a body could be incinerated in 7. 5 minutes or in 15 minutes as per the Bischoff document and Tauber or the Pressac and Van PElt who simply halve that in accord with the change of propaganda from the 4 million figure.

[PART 3 of 3: ]

Aside from the German technicians themselves- Jean Claude Pressac himself dismissed the Bischoff document as a fraud and also the super cremation lie. Therefore the liar in their attempt to make a save for the problem is forced not only to confront physical reality and technical possibility, as well as screech forgery about an obviously real document (Mattogno's document 1) and oppose the German technician's themselves- but they must also either declare Pressac an idiot, or submit that he is an undercover revisionist. They'll unlikely want to do either and hence dodge that issue like the plague, usually claiming they don't rely on Pressac. (? ) But also unable to cite a single person they can rely on, with Zimmerman knocked out as absurd.

The problem is that Van Pelt's entire argumentation is plageurised from Pressac's first early work " Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers" [which is now available in a critical edition as part of Holocaust Handbooks here... http: //holocausthandbooks. com/dl/42-ataootgc. pdf - it is very difficult to obtain an original copy of the book for reasons that it in itself is quasi-revisionist as you can see discussed here.. https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=G7_61XmIOhk- but that doesn't stop it being cited by the USHMM even today] prior to Pressac's own revisions. This constitutes academic fraud. It was noticed by the Klarsfeld's what Pressac was doing which is why they dropped him and transported the original arguments to their new front man Van Pelt. The revisionists wrote Pressac's obituary upon his death and the orthdox community uttered not a single word in icy silence. (? )

All of Pressac's original arguments were available demolished to David Irving during his trial in the form of Mattogno's first edition of his work available appended to this book here... http: //holocausthandbooks. com/dl/14-apf. pdf which then became " Case for Sanity" including Van Pelt and is now in it's latest edition " Real Case for Auschwitz" available here... http: //holocausthandbooks. com/dl/22-trcfa. pdf- in which the entire evidence for the Lipstadt-Irving trial is refuted beyond any possible doubt (of course with no orthdox rebuttal ever offered in lieu of imposing the international censor)- he made no attempt to utilize anything from it, again claiming he's never read a revisionist book! He refused all technical support from all revisionists and refused even a lawyer (? )

This has caused an area of real debate among revisionists- it must be accepted that David Irving during his famous trial was either (a) a complete fool, who knew nothing of the then up to date revisionist arguments which flattened the then 20 year old- now 40 year old- propaganda arguments that Van Pelt was using (stolen from Pressac who had later largely conceded them), refused to read a relevant revisionist book (such as Mattogno's work), refused to admit the Rudolf Report citing " I have my reasons" without elaborating, which exonerated the Leuchter report and crushed the opponents rebuttals with no anwer ever coming in favour of the censor, refused to solicit any revisionist experts for help at all and refused even a lawyer! OR (b) for those same reasons- the Irving/Lipstadt trial was a complete shill with Irving fully complicit.

Irving having seen the Leuchter report at the time of the 2nd Zundel Trial became convinced- as any reasonable person could have been- that the Holocaust Myth was imminently about to collapse and Irving wanted to be on the bandwagon as the first mainstream historian to announce it for his own fame/wealth. When it became clear this was not going to happen he minimized his involvement to only Crema's 1-5 at Auschwitz which he had committed himself to, and the Western camps which are conceded by all sober liars anyway but otherwise conceded to the orthdox. This has spawned the " neo-exterminationist" sect of liars and also is used to support certain conspiracy theories! It's very possible his straw manning on this issue was solicited by the anti-revisionists themselves and could explain why today he is wealthy and able to conduct exterminationist tours around Poland and further East. It could also explain why his previously factual works (Dresden, Hitler, Churchill) then took a turn to a condemning and orthodox-lie view (Goebbel's, Himmler) as a measure of appeasement.

This scenario if true of Irving could be a counter punch to Pressac's " trojan horse" activity. He himself is reported to have told Germar Rudolf that " it's too dangerous to tackle this thing head on- you have to do it in small stages from the side". A sort of " Empire Strikes Back" situation.

Returning from speculation: Judge Gray accepts the Bischoff document in the face of no counter evidence offered from Irving who " apparently" has no clue what is going on- apparently " believing" you can burn 9 bodies per hour in a single oven muffle! (? ) Whether Gray is bribed or not is speculation- being a judge he could be forgiven for not understanding cremation- although common sense one would think would prevail even given the lack of any further evidence offered by Irving.

To summarize the Irving-Lipstadt trial at " best": 2 people (Lipstadt/Irving) who know nothing about the subject meet in court. Irving refuses to enlist the help of any expert on the subject. Lipstadt enlists the help of someone (Van Pelt) who also knows nothing about the subject. Irving despite this manages to in common sense terms demolish Van Pelt's arguments. But Judge Gray finds against Irving anyway due to little other option. Not a single revisionist argument is addressed let alone refuted. Revisionism is claimed to be refuted even though not a single revisionist is addressed nor a single revisionist argument (? ). David Irving is characterised today as a " revisionist" (false) and a holocaust denier (false)- he today conducts exterminationist tours even! His position on Cremas 1-5 is of course completely correct. It has been surmised that neo-exterminationism is also a foresight that the Holocaust Myth will next collapse to the position of Irving et al- in that Madjanek and Auschwitz will be completely conceded leaving only Reinhardt (the most absurd part of the lie for which there is no evidence to even speak of) and Einsatzgruppen (where the issue is most delicate because Jew's really were executed)- in this case Irving et al will become the new face of extermination/anti-revisionism marketing the myth themselves.

Regarding Bischoff document and super-cremation..

We've looked at physical possibility, technical capability, the incompatibility with other genuine documents, the general nature of fraudulent documentation, the declarations of the German's themselves, the concession of a regarded orthodox scholar (Pressac) and the farce of the Irving-Lipstadt trial. We've seen the scholars Zimmerman and Van Pelt completely busted.

It's clear the Bischoff document and the super-cremation lie are myths- and that on common sense grounds you can't burn a body in 7. 5 minutes with any technology even today.

And the strategy to keep the myth in place...

" Ultimately and with this I conclude- that our objective should be to create a society where denial of the genocide is seen as so outrageous and so dispeccable- that anybody who engages in it would be renedered a pariah"
Deborah Lipstadt.

With the real cremation capacity of the crematoria grounded in reality- which in reality could not really cope with the actual real life deaths at Auschwitz circa 130, 000 people- the propaganda figures cannot be true irrespective of any other lies.

28/4/2019