![]()
|
|||||||
Если бы было возможно получить образец крови Исуса Христа, что мы могли бы обнаружить? ⇐ ПредыдущаяСтр 2 из 2 Если бы было возможно получить образец крови Исуса Христа, что мы могли бы обнаружить?
Чтобы быть бессмертными, клетки должны быть способны к жизни на любой стадии, чтобы апоптозия (запрограммированная смерть клетки) была бы невозможна. Можно было бы вырастить белые клетки крови и изучить структуру ДНК (то есть условия жизни). Кариотипы выращенных клеток могли бы быть получены с помощью ситогенетических технологий для того, чтобы пронаблюдать одновременно за набором и за структурой хромосом. Это дало бы толчок в понимании деятельности генов и природы человека, известного как СЫН БОЖИЙ».
Какую роль сыграла в наследовании генов Y-хромосома Небесного Отца, и отразилась ли Y-хромосома на Гаплогруппе Сына Человеческого, и какова она будет, эта Гаплогруппа, возможно, покажет будущий анализ Крови Христа. " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " ЮДЖИН о РОНЕ A ScientistAnalyzesMr. Wyatt'sChromosomeTheory Dr. EugeneDunkley, Geneticist August 1999, England InregardstothestatementsmadebyRonWyattandhischromosomalanalysis: I donotbelievethatanyofRon'sfindingsorconclusionswilleffecttheSeventhDayAdventistsortheirfaith. I don'tbelievethathehad a crusadeagainstthedenominationoranydenominationforthatmatter. Rehisfindings-youmustrememberthatRonwas NOT a scientist, hewasananesthetist. Thisisnottoexcusemistakesinhisdetails, buttounderstandmoreaccuratelywherehewascomingfrom. I satwithRonandDerekatD'shouseinOxfordandRonexplainedtomewhatwasdone. I filledinthedetailsinmyownmind, knowingthattherewereholesinwhathesaid, butnotdonetodeceive, just a lackofknowledge. Karyotypesareperformedallthetime. Itis a techniqueinwhichthechromosomesarearrestedinmetaphaseby a drugandthenstainedwitheitherGiemsaor a reversestain, andtheninthisstageareseparatedandcountedandcharacterized. Thereisalso a bandingpatternassociatedwitheachchromosomepairsothatidentificationofthechromosomeisunmistakable. Whitebloodcellsaretheonlybloodcellsthatcanbeusedforsuchan " experiment". Russell'scriticismisinaccuratebecauseheomittedwhatwouldhavehadtohappenfortheexperimenttotakeplace. First, thebloodsamplewasscrapedfromthealtar. Thecellswereresuspendedin PBS (a buffer), whichallowedthecellstore-hydrate. Then, thecellswerecultured. Onlycellswith DNA wouldbeabletogrowinculture, sothereisnoneedto " separate" redbloodcells, platelets, etc., becausetheysimplywouldn'tbepresentin a freshlygrowingculture. Thesecellsweresimplywhitebloodcellsinculture (a routineprocedure). Next, thecells (orsomeofthem) wouldbetaken, arrestedwhenthecellswereinmetaphase (whenthechromosomecondenseandarevisiblebymicroscopy) andstained. Someofthestainsallowlightmicroscopy, butothersallowfluorescentmicroscopy. I imaginethatRondidn'tknowonetypeofmicrocopefromanother; hecoulduseanelectronmicroscopetoseethechromosomes, butcertainlynottocountthemorcharacterizethem. However, thatwouldnotdetractfromthefinding. Thekaryotypewouldhavebeenmade, andthechromosomesplacedintheirproperpairs. RonwasconvincedthatthebloodofthealtarwasinfactthedivinebloodofJesusbecausethechromosomecountwas 24. IfJesuswas ONLY humanwewouldexpect 46. Infact, ifhefound 46 chromosomesI wouldhavemydoubtsbecausetheargumentwouldbethatitwassimplythebloodof a humanbeing (exceptofcoursethatthewhitebloodcellswerere-vitalizedafteralmost 2000 years.... ). Russelliswrongaboutthefrequencyofchromosomaldiseasesinhumans: a numberofconditionsinvolvingeither 47 or 45 chromosomeshavebeenwellcharacterized, besidesTurner's, suchasKlinefelters, Down'ssyndrome, Pateau'ssyndrome, Cri-de-Chatsyndrome, XYY, XXY, etc. andinfacttherewas a caseinwhich a youngmanwasfoundalivewithonly 24chromosomes. YoumustrememberthatRon'sinaccuraciesindescribingthisfindingareduetothefactthathedidnotpersonallydotheexperimentsorpreparethecells, becauseitisnothisfieldofexpertise. Hesimplygotthedataandpresenteditwiththeunderstandingthathehad. Russellmaybecorrectaboutotheraspectsoftheresearch (I amnotanarchaeologist), buthehimselfisnotaccurateaboutthecellsandthechromosomes, andhiscritiquesuggeststhatheisbeingsubjective. Ofcourse, I onlyhavethedescriptionofwhatRonsaidtome, so I toohavenoharddata. However, ifthereis a needtoexplainthisdata I wouldbehappytodosoindefenseofthefindings. Infact, thereareseveralmoreexperimentsthatcouldbedonetofurtherprovewhatRonstated. However, I donotbelievethattheywouldbenecessary, andinfactwouldcause a fewproblems (especiallyinthisageofcloning, onewouldconceivablywanttoclonethedivinechromosomeandmodifythemselves). I dorememberthatRonwasreluctanttosayanythingaboutthefinding, buthefeltmovedduringhistalkatourchurch, havingmetwithmeearlier, tosaywhathehadfound. Heknewthat I wouldhavesomeknowledgeofthefield, andifinfacthethoughtitwasdodgyhewould NOT havesaidanythingbecauseheknewthat I wouldbeoneofthefewpeopleabletopickitapart. Hesaiditinhissermonknowingthat I wouldunderstandit, and I feeltothisdaythatGodmovedonhimtodosothatthefindingwouldbespokenofandwouldstandthetest. ThisconvincesmethatRonisright...
|
|||||||
|