|
||||||||||||
it + a form of be (+ not and/or adverb) +emphasised word/phrase+ that /which/ who clause ⇐ ПредыдущаяСтр 3 из 3 it + a form of be (+ not and/or adverb) +emphasised word/phrase+ that /which/ who clause We can use this pattern to emphasise the subject or the object of a simple sentence, or an adverbial phrase, or a prepositional phrase:
In informal English, we can use when and where clauses, but we do not use how or why: · It was in January when I got the test results. · It’s in Green Street market where we’ll find the best bargains. X It was greed why he did it. ✓ It was because of greed that he did it X It is using a calculator how he does it. ✓ It is by using a calculator that he does it Note: We cannot use it clefts to highlight the action or a verb complement in a sentence. We use wh- clefts to do this: X It was taking Sally to the party that Mike did. ✓ What Mike did was take Sally X It is totally unscrupulous that they are. ✓ What they are is unscrupulous Wh- cleft Sentences We can use this pattern to highlight the action in a sentence. For example, if we want to highlight Mike’s action of taking Sally to the party: wh- clause + a form of be + emphasised word or phrase · What Mike did was take Sally to the party In these sentences what means the thing(s) that. The wh- clause must contain a verb. To highlight the action we use a form of do in the wh- clause. The highlighted phrase usually contains a bare infinitive (example above) or to + infinitive: · What Mike did was to take Sally to the party. If the highlighted verb is in the continuous or perfect, the form of do matches it: · The boys aren’t leaving Sandy at home. They are taking him to the match. · => What the boys are doing is taking Sandy to the match · Old members are absent but the new members have taken their seats in the assembly. · => What the new members have done is taken their seats in the assembly
|
||||||||||||
|