Whereby;.it is an offence at common law for any person(s) who knows that treason is being planned or committed within or without the realm, not to report the same as soon as he/she can to a justice of the peace.. WITH PREJUDICE.

From:

Address:

To: doing business as

Address:

Date Notice served:

Served by recorded post.

NOTICE OF COERCION TO AID AND ABET HIGH
TREASON & MISPRISION OF TREASON

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.

Dear _____________________,

Please read the following 'Notice' thoroughly and carefully. It is a NOTICE, a LAWFUL DOCUMENT and EVIDENCE. It informs you. It means what it says. The information herein is of the UTMOST IMPORTANCE and requires your IMMEDIATE and URGENT ATTENTION.

Please be aware that failure to act upon this LAWFUL NOTICE in accordance with the 1795 treason Act, which being the current law of this realm, contravenes the lawful duty of every/all English and Commonwealth sovereign men/women and anyone else whilst residing within these shores, or within or without the realm of the English Isles and Commonwealth and, is an OFFENCE under the (unlawfully repealed) 'Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act 1795, ' SECTION 5 (Misprision of treason).

Whereby;... it is an offence at common law for any person(s) who knows that treason is being planned or committed within or without the realm, not to report the same as soon as he/she can to a justice of the peace.

Also please be aware that the penalty for committing 'Misprision of Treason' in this day is life imprisonment and total asset stripping, and that my sole intention of informing you of this fact in law is one of duty and not malice, frivolity, vexation nor ill will.

Whereas you persist to harass or ignore I, ____________________ despite being notified of the facts, and that you have made UNLAWFUL DEMANDS on myself or the fraudulently created 'legal fiction', and that you are either continuing to coerce me to comply with unlawful, treasonous statutes by threat of enforcement, and or have ignored my claims entirely and, that you are acting in a criminal capacity for a 'corporation' whom has at this time no lawful claim against I, ____________________ a sovereign subject/resident standing in lawful dissent and, whilst Parliament is committing high treason against the sovereign peoples of the English Isles and Commonwealth at this time, therefore I cannot lawfully nor morally support financially, or in any other way a treasonous administration of governance, or any private/public entity/person not also standing under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 whilst demanded/commanded by law to do so. Indeed our constitutional law FORBIDS ME TO DO SO!

Therefore...

It is to my understanding that you must now by the common laws of this realm and, with the evidence herein/therein supplied STOP all unlawful actions against I, _____________________ immediately. I have absolute 'lawful excuse' to deny payment or service to any agency of the Crown, or to make deals with anyone not also standing under said article 61.

In light of the evidence reported to you personally ___________________ herein this notice, also the evidence supplied within previous Notices served, by LAW must now be reported by YOU to the police for you to stay within the confines of constitutional law, failure to do so would contravene the 1795 Treason Act section V and would therefore be an act of 'misprision of treason at common law'.

I may be forced by law to report any further illegal demands from you to the police.

FURTHERMORE, where it is to my understanding and evidenced herein that:

1. ) A long range deception to overthrow the sovereignty of the British Isles, by controlling its currency and the powers to determine its own laws and affairs, was finalized by the Geo-political centre of the third Reich in Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war, militarily, they should continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically, through corporatism (aka fascism), and political subversion.

Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled 'Europaische wirtschaftsgemeinschaft' (public document worldcat. OCLC number 31002821). Translated into English as 'European Economic Community'. The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

2. ) Since the end of the war diverse treasonous persons, groups and movements with this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as the European Union.

3. ) The involvement of the United Kingdom in this agenda began in 1948 with the formation of the European movement. This was a state funded Anglo-Frenchpro-federal European lobbying body posing as a non-governmental grass-roots pressure group. The documentation evidencing these events are present on the discs FCO 30/1048.

4. ) The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European integration and a European constitution. Also Common Purpose are an active pro EU lobby group masquerading as a charity with its grubby hands within our local services and institutions.

5. ) The first move toward a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly, it was the signing of the treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

6. ) Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archived documents from the period 1970-72 which shows the deceit perpetrated by the (so called) “ruling elite” at the time, and these documents have since been released after the illegal thirty year rule hid them under national security legislation - entitled 'FCO 30-10/48 '. A compilation of nearly 300 documents copied from the original documents which are still archived within the public records office today.

7. ) The common law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and dictates that we are all born free to do whatever we choose for ourselves provided we do not cause harm or loss to another's life, liberty or property, or their rights to life, liberty or property. Not to Breach the peace nor to dishonour agreements and or contracts entered into.

8. ) England, within the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain’ (both the latter two titles are now corporations) is a common law jurisdiction and the English parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender land or transfer, even temporarily, sovereignty except when conquered in war.

9. ) No man (neither monarch, nor prime minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge or public servant) is above the common laws of England and the Commonwealth, which forms the English Constitution (Magna Carta 1215, and original Coronation Oath. The last constitutionally correct coronation Oath was taken by the traitor James II in 1685).

10. ) Treason in statute law was redefined by the unrepealed Treason Act 1795 for the principal forms to include; a) compassing the death or serious injury of the sovereign or his/her spouse or eldest son; b) levying war against the sovereign in his/her realm, which includes, any insurrection against the authority of the sovereign or of the government that goes beyond riot or violent disorder; c) giving aid or comfort to the sovereign's enemies in war time.

11. ) Treason at common law is the offence of attempting to overthrow a constitutionally bound Government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.

12. ) Sedition at common law means overt conduct such as writing, speech and organization that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

13. ) The evidence presented in the FCO 30/1048 ' files shows that the Heath Government of 1972 was well aware that an essential loss of national sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passing of the European Communities Bill and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to the people which of course it was not. This in itself is an act of Sedition at common law.

14. ) The passage of the European Communities Act in 1972, establishing the principle that European law would always prevail over English and Commonwealth law in the event of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the English parliament, was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Heath administration.

15. ) The signing of the single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain's independent decision making powers further by extending qualified majority voting in certain areas of policy making, was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Thatcher administration.

16. ) The signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin document 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the usurped Queen in parliament to an unelected body in Europe, was an Act of Treason at common law by the Major administration.

17. ) The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Unions powers for action at community level. This included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol, was an Act of Treason at common law by the Blair administration.

18. ) With the full knowledge of this Treason and to escape prosecution, the Blair Government illegally repealed the 1795 Treason legislation in section 36 of the 'Crime and Disorder Act 1998' in an attempt to abolish the death penalty for high treason, however, the crime of Treason at common law still stands within other Acts (1351 - 1848 as well as 1795) as common law has primacy. This was a further Act of treason by the Blair Administration.

19. ) The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the E. U. Constitution in 2004 were further Acts of Treason at common law by the Blair administration.

20. ) In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution, the Blair Government removed the word 'sovereignty' from the oath of office of constables in the police reform Act 2002 (section 83), and also modified the legislation to enable non English and British nationals to become officers (section 82). These are acts of both Sedition and Treason at common law by the Blair administration.

21. ) The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy including that relating to immigration and borders, was an Act of Treason at common law by the Brown administration.

22. ) The recent Prime Minister David Cameron, by denying the English peoples right to a referendum on the European Union, which was misdirection anyway since it is illegal to vote to remain or leave a treasonous institution, and by surrendering further powers to the EU for direct taxation on the English/British people, and by allowing the EU to end the rebate via further proposed treaties, is evidence to prove that this is an Act of Treason at Common Law by the Cameron administration.

23. ) Theresa May (late imposter) prime minister for providing a draft Brexit bill on the 14th November 2018, which under article 171 provided the EU judiciary authority over our own common law judiciary and constitution and, for attempting to provide the EU control of our armed forces (PESCO) ‘Permanent Structured Cooperation’ and, whilst using the treasonous Brexit trap, which is a trap because it is treason to provide Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty with authority to take us out of the EU, especially whilst the evidence proves that we were never legally in the EU. The above stated facts were Acts of High Treason at common law committed by the May Administration.

24. ) The treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an independent audit by professional accountants of their books. One year of non- publication is a criminal offence. In fact, its financial accounts have been disapproved by the EU's own court of auditors. This crime has already been reported to the UK Serious Fraud Office by former MP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to him that the remittance of English taxpayer's funds into the hands of this criminal enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.

Our constitutional law demands that we ALL take up lawful dissent (diffidatio) in support of the Barons petition of the 7th of February 2001 and, to continue to distress those who refuse to do so, as to the terms and conditions laid down under Article 61 Magna Carta 1215, which was Invoked by the barons' committee on the 23rd March 2001 and reported in the Daily Telegraph by Caroline Davis on the 24th March 2001 under the title 'Peers Petition Queen on Europe'. The invocation of Article 61 still stands to this very day as the lawful position of the English Isles and commonwealth.

More evidence confirming that treason has and is being committed, is provided herein with regard to a PDF link of a compilation of scanned public records documents amounting to almost 300 pages entitled 'FCO 30/1048'. Within this compilation of signed and sometimes stamped documentation the evidence of both sedition and treason are proven. This information can be readily found on the internet for your perusal (see Exhibit E).

Furthermore, a transcript of a letter sent to Edward Heath from Lord Kilmuir which proved further evidence of Heath and Co's High Treason is provided herein (see Exhibit D).

I now AFFIRM that all of the information herein is correct and true to the best of my knowledge and first hand experience, and that I am of lawful age and mentally competent to serve this 'Notice of Coercion to Aid and Abet High Treason & Misprision of treason'.

I hereby affix my common law name to all of the affirmations and claims made herein this document, with explicit reservations to all my natural, unalienable Sovereign Rights and Habeas Corpus, and to my specific common law Right not to be bound by any contract nor obligation which I have not knowingly, willingly, voluntarily and without misrepresentation, duress or coercion entered into, and that any hearing with regard to this matter(s) is to be heard under the jurisdiction of the common law of the land, in open forum, as this matter is of course in the public interest and, that this is in accordance with due process of law and my constitutional rights.

Without Malice, vexation, frivolity or ill will, and on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.

WITH PREJUDICE.

Signed:

Witnessed by:

Date:

Witness 1.

Witness 2.

Witness 3.

EVIDENCE:

Exhibit A: Copy of the Daily Telegraph report 'Peers petition Queen on Europe' 24th March 2001;

Exhibit B: Copy of the letters between the barons Committee and the office of Sovereign in 2001.

Exhibit C: The entire text of Article 61' Enforcement clause'.

Maxim: ”Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all a sworn officer of the law. ”

Exhibit D: Transcript of a letter sent to Edward Heath from Lord Kilmuir

Exhibit E: Link to PDF file 'FCO 30/1048'

Exhibit A:

Daily Telegraph report on the invocation of Article 61 - “Peers Petition Queen on Europe”. By Caroline Davies -12: 00am GMT 24 Mar 2001:

“FOUR peers invoked ancient rights under the Magna Carta yesterday to petition the Queen to block closer integration with Europe.

The Duke of Rutland, Viscount Masserene and Ferrard, Lord Hamilton of Dalzell and Lord Ashbourne were imbued with the spirit of the ancient Charter, thrust on King John in 1215. In accordance with the Charter's Clause 61, the famous enforcement clause, the four presented a vellum parchment at Buckingham Palace, declaring that the ancient rights and freedoms of the British people had to be defended.

The clause, one of the most important in the Charter, which was pressed on King John at Runnymede, allows subjects of the realm to present a quorum of 25 barons with a petition, which four of their number then have to take to the Monarch, who must accept it. It was last used in 1688 at the start of the Glorious Revolution.

The four peers, who were all thrown out of Parliament in November 1999, proved they had that quorum by presenting Sir Robin Janvrin, the Queen's private secretary, with the petition signed by 28 hereditaries and letters of support from another 60. In addition, they claim the support of thousands of members of the public.

They say that several articles in the Treaty of Nice agreed by Tony Blair in December will destroy fundamental British liberties. The Queen has 40 days to respond. Under the Magna Carta's provisions, if the Sovereign does not observe the Charter the people may rise up and wage war on her, seizing castles, lands and possessions until they have redress. ”

Exhibit B: